|
Tips for Developing
Proposals that Get Funded
The key to any grant-winning effort
is to develop a superior proposal based on a great idea that fits
the funding agency's aims. Understanding the type of people who will
be reviewing your proposal and making their job as easy as possible
makes the difference between a good proposal and one that gets
funded. Here are some suggestions for improving your chances of
winning an award:
|
|
|
| Follow the
instructions carefully |
Provide all the
information asked for in the application instructions, in the order
requested. Make a list of everything you are going to need and the
questions you need to answer. Identify the data you need, the
supporting documents, resumes, and required forms, etc. |
|
|
Communicate
clearly
and concisely |
State clearly and
accurately what you will do, how you will do it and why it is
important. Don't leave your reviewers guessing about what you mean.
Justify everything, including budget items, according to their
importance to the project. Avoid jargon; no reviewer wants to take
the time to use a dictionary to figure out what you are trying to
say. Saying the same thing several different ways is also irritating
to the reviewer, so avoid unnecessary repetition. |
|
|
| Be
organized |
A detailed table of
contents, informative abstract, and logically presented narrative
that uses headings and strong topic sentences mean less work
(hunting) for reviewers. |
|
|
Format for
readability
and attractiveness |
Don't right-justify; that
makes it harder for a weary reviewer to read. Use headings, tables,
charts and graphs to break up the narrative and to succinctly
present information. Use headings and underlining to call attention
to important sections or words. Leave a reasonable amount of white
space on the pages. Pay close attention to any formatting
requirements contained in the application. Don't single-space if it
tells you to double-space. |
|
|
Early
Preparation and
Time Management |
Get the program
announcement early and analyze it. Obtain copies of previous
applications, since many change minimally from one year to the next,
and start using the old application as a guide until the new version
is available. Keep in mind that anything mailed from Washington
(i.e. the new application) will take at least a week to get to
California, so the more you can do ahead of time, the better. Talk
to program officers about expected changes between the old timetable
for proposal development, review, and finalization to help you in
managing the process and your time. |
|
|
| Get
feedback on your drafts from others |
Preparation will be
easier if you work with a team. The team may include colleagues,
District Grants Director, Deans and/or Associate Deans, Researchers,
Accountants, and support staff. Get feedback and suggestions from
colleagues in your own or other institutions. Program Officers are
frequently willing to read a short concept paper several months
prior to the start of an application process, and can provide
valuable advice and feedback. |
|
|
| Cover all
the bases |
Make sure you provide
everything the application has asked for and that you have
anticipated and addressed any concerns that the reviewers may have.
Remember that both your proposal and the reviewer are on the line. |
|
|
Proposal
deadlines
are absolute |
If your proposal is late,
it's dead! Read deadline and mailing information carefully. Does it
say that it must be in the agency's mailroom by 5 p.m. Friday the
13th or does it say postmarked by that date? If it has to be at the
agency by that time, don't count on 24-hour delivery to get it there
on time. Allow at least two extra days for the mistakes that can and
do happen. Get proposals postmarked at the Post Office, not your
college mailroom. Don't give the mailroom responsibility for taking
it to the Post Office, or giving it to Federal Express. It may not
get there when it needs to. Do it yourself so you know it's safely
on its way. And get proof of the date and time mailed. If you mail
it through Federal Express, your package can be tracked. |
|
|
Learn from
your
experience and don't
be afraid to reapply |
If your proposal fails to
be funded, request the reviewer comments, read them carefully, talk
to the Program Officer and use this information to improve and
resubmit your proposal. Many proposals are funded on the second or
even third try. According to Dr. Robert Watson, Director of
Undergraduate Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Education at the
National Science Foundation, "Statistically, those who apply a
second time do better." (Source: AACJC Times, Jan. 2, 1990) |